Sufficient conditions for the existence of Nash equilibria in bimatrix games in terms of forbidden \(2 \times 2\) subgames
نویسندگان
چکیده
In 1964 Shapley observed that a matrix has a saddle point in pure strategies whenever every its 2 × 2 submatrix has one. In contrast, a bimatrix game may have no pure strategy Nash equilibrium (NE) even when every 2 × 2 subgame has one. Nevertheless, Shapley’s claim can be extended to bimatrix games as follows. We partition all 2×2 bimatrix games into fifteen classes C = {c1, . . . , c15} depending on the preferences of two players. A subset t ⊆ C is called a NE-theorem if a bimatrix game has a NE whenever it contains no subgame from t. We suggest a general method for getting all minimal (that is, strongest) NE-theorems based on the procedure of joint generation of transversal hypergraphs given by a special oracle. By this method we obtain all (six) strongest NE-theorems.
منابع مشابه
On the effect of risk aversion in bimatrix games
Nash equilibria with identical supports are compared for bimatrix games that are different with respect to the risk aversion of player 2. For equilibria in 2× 2-bimatrix games and for equilibria with efficient supports in coordination games it is established for which cases increased risk aversion of player 2 benefits or hurts player 2.
متن کاملWell Supported Approximate Equilibria in Bimatrix Games: A Graph Theoretic Approach
We study the existence and tractability of a notion of approximate equilibria in bimatrix games, called well supported approximate Nash Equilibria (SuppNE in short). We prove existence of ε−SuppNE for any constant ε ∈ (0, 1), with only logarithmic support sizes for both players. Also we propose a polynomial–time construction of SuppNE, both for win lose and for arbitrary (normalized) bimatrix g...
متن کاملOn the commitment value and commitment optimal strategies in bimatrix games
Given a bimatrix game, the associated leadership or commitment games are defined as the games at which one player, the leader, commits to a (possibly mixed) strategy and the other player, the follower, chooses his strategy after having observed the irrevocable commitment of the leader. Based on a result by von Stengel and Zamir [2010], the notions of commitment value and commitment optimal stra...
متن کاملZero-Sum Game Techniques for Approximate Nash Equilibria
We apply existing, and develop new, zero-sum game techniques for designing polynomial-time algorithms to compute additive approximate Nash equilibria in bimatrix games. In particular, we give a polynomial-time algorithm that given an arbitrary bimatrix game as an input, outputs either an additive 1 3 -Nash equilibrium or an additive 1 2 -well-supported Nash equilibrium; and we give a polynomial...
متن کاملApproximate Nash Equilibria with Near Optimal Social Welfare
It is known that Nash equilibria and approximate Nash equilibria not necessarily optimize social optima of bimatrix games. In this paper, we show that for every fixed ε > 0, every bimatrix game (with values in [0, 1]) has an ε-approximate Nash equilibrium with the total payoff of the players at least a constant factor, (1 − √ 1− ε), of the optimum. Furthermore, our result can be made algorithmi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Int. J. Game Theory
دوره 45 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016